Tumorerkrankungen

Auf dieser Seite finden Sie einen Überblick zu unseren aktuellen klinischen Studien

Die Dresdner Hochschulmedizin ist führend in der Therapie komplexer, besonders schwerer oder seltener Erkrankungen. Durch die enge Verzahnung von Forschung, Lehre und Krankenversorgung können innovative Therapiemethoden und neueste Erkenntnisse aus der Forschung schnell und auf direktem Weg in die Behandlung unserer Patienten eingebracht werden.

Um neue Behandlungsformen, Therapien oder Medikamente auf ihre Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit zu prüfen, sind klinische Studien erforderlich. Die Dresdner Hochschulmedizin führt zahlreiche solcher klinischen Studien durch. Durch die Teilnahme an klinischen Studien erhalten Patienten die Möglichkeit, sich auf freiwilliger Basis sehr frühzeitig und unter strengen Kontrollbedingungen neuen Therapiemethoden, Arzneimittelanwendungen oder anderen medizinischen Interventionen zu unterziehen.

CheckMate7DX

A Study of Nivolumab or Placebo in Combination with Docetaxel in Men with Advanced Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

SPL-01-001

This will be a confirmatory, prospective, open-label, single-arm, reader-blinded, multi-centre phase 3 study to assess the diagnostic accuracy and safety of Ferrotran®-enhanced MRI in comparison to unenhanced MRI in the detection of pelvic lymph node metastases in newly-diagnosed adult patients with prostate cancer and an intermediate to high risk for lymph node metastases, based on the D'Amico criteria.

ADAM

The primary objective of this trial is to determine if adjuvant apalutamide in prostate cancer patients at high risk of developing subsequent metastatic disease results in prolonged biochemically recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy (RPE) in comparison to standard of care (SOC)

KEYNOTE-991

This study will assess the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide plus ADT versus placebo plus enzalutamide plus ADT in participants with mHSPC. The primary hypothesis is that in participants with mHSPC, the combination of pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide plus ADT is superior to placebo plus enzalutamide plus ADT with respect to 1) radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) per Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG)-modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) and 2) overall survival (OS)

KEYNOTE-B15

The purpose of this study is to assess the antitumor efficacy and safety of perioperative enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab and radical cystectomy (RC) + pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) compared with the current standard of care (neoadjuvant chemotherapy [gemcitabine plus cisplatin] and RC + PLND) for participants with MIBC who are cisplatin-eligible. The dual primary hypotheses are preoperative EV + pembrolizumab and RC + PLND (Arm A) will achieve superior pathologic complete response (pCR) rate and perioperative EV and pembrolizumab and RC + PLND (Arm A) will achieve superior event free survival (EFS) compared with neoadjuvant gemcitabine + cisplatin and RC + PLND (Arm B)

THOR

The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy of erdafitinib versus chemotherapy or pembrolizumab in participants with advanced urothelial cancer harboring selected fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) aberrations who have progressed after 1 or 2 prior treatments, at least 1 of which includes an anti-programmed death ligand 1(PD-[L]1) agent (cohort 1) or 1 prior treatment not containing an anti-PD-(L) 1 agent (cohort 2)

CaboPoint

The overall objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib as 2nd line treatment in subjects with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic RCC with a clear-cell component, who progressed after prior Checkpoint Inhibitors (CPI) therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab in combination or CPI combined with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy

MK-6482-005

The primary objective of this study is to compare belzutifan to everolimus with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) and to compare everolimus with respect to overall survival (OS). The hypothesis is that belzutifan is superior to everolimus with respect to PFS and OS